Amy Tenderich weighs in on the name debate: patient vs. consumer. Almost anything is better than cyberchondriac or medical googler, but e-patient is still my favorite.
I help people navigate health and technology.
Footer
Recent Comments
on Engage with Grace: “Your survey forgets one important option that is legal in many states. I may wish to die of assisted suicide.…” Nov 22, 12:08
on Engage with Grace: “Thanks, Susannah. Engage with Grace is still so relevant and elegant in its design…just the nudge that we need to…” Nov 22, 10:52
on Wow! How? False Boundaries: “Fascinating! Thank you, Bart, for the suggestion to flip the Advanced Directive conversation into one that asks questions of clinicians…” Nov 17, 15:22
I loathe the word “consumer” — as if we use up healthcare. “Patient” isn’t much better, though it goes nicely with “waiting room”. I personally lobbied for “Fergusons”, but Tom put his foot down on that one.
How about “Health Activist”? That was a suggestion from Marie Connelly over on DiabetesMine.com. I also like Jane Sarasohn-Kahn’s suggestion of “citizen.”
Seems like each term
Seems like each term has pro’s and con’s. The reality is that we ARE acting like health consumers, but the term sure is cold and doesn’t embrace the elements of being a good, or savvy consumer. e-patient much better at that I think. Health Activist makes me think of people marching on Washington–which although probably not a bad idea–not the right term for everyday actions.
Will be nice when “patient” itself embodies all that we want e-patient to mean.