Amy Tenderich weighs in on the name debate: patient vs. consumer. Almost anything is better than cyberchondriac or medical googler, but e-patient is still my favorite.
I help people navigate health and technology.
Before Footer
Recent Comments
on Networkers pool resources: “Thank you, Casey! I know Charlie second-hand, through Gilles but we’ve never connected. I’ll reach out!” May 26, 09:56
on Networkers pool resources: “Wow, Kevin, you’re juggling a lot! Glad you’ve found some resources/connections, would definitely say that #btsm is a good source…” May 26, 09:31
on Networkers pool resources: “Kevin, I’m at a loss for words at the depth of the insights and poignancy you shared here. Let’s begin…” May 26, 08:32
I loathe the word “consumer” — as if we use up healthcare. “Patient” isn’t much better, though it goes nicely with “waiting room”. I personally lobbied for “Fergusons”, but Tom put his foot down on that one.
How about “Health Activist”? That was a suggestion from Marie Connelly over on DiabetesMine.com. I also like Jane Sarasohn-Kahn’s suggestion of “citizen.”
Seems like each term
Seems like each term has pro’s and con’s. The reality is that we ARE acting like health consumers, but the term sure is cold and doesn’t embrace the elements of being a good, or savvy consumer. e-patient much better at that I think. Health Activist makes me think of people marching on Washington–which although probably not a bad idea–not the right term for everyday actions.
Will be nice when “patient” itself embodies all that we want e-patient to mean.