Amy Tenderich weighs in on the name debate: patient vs. consumer. Almost anything is better than cyberchondriac or medical googler, but e-patient is still my favorite.
I help people navigate health and technology.
Footer
Recent Comments
on Rare Disease in the NYT: “Liz, thank you for sharing this comment! I’m sorry for your loss and the experience you went through. Thank you…” Jul 4, 12:05
on Rare Disease in the NYT: “The author’s willingness to grapple with her competing instincts is admirable. As a former “medical mom,” I found the peer-connection…” Jul 1, 21:46
on Case study: Trevor’s disease: “Hi Jill – currently Brandon is walking without a limp (he is almost 15 now). He was going to undergo…” Jun 5, 14:07
I loathe the word “consumer” — as if we use up healthcare. “Patient” isn’t much better, though it goes nicely with “waiting room”. I personally lobbied for “Fergusons”, but Tom put his foot down on that one.
How about “Health Activist”? That was a suggestion from Marie Connelly over on DiabetesMine.com. I also like Jane Sarasohn-Kahn’s suggestion of “citizen.”
Seems like each term
Seems like each term has pro’s and con’s. The reality is that we ARE acting like health consumers, but the term sure is cold and doesn’t embrace the elements of being a good, or savvy consumer. e-patient much better at that I think. Health Activist makes me think of people marching on Washington–which although probably not a bad idea–not the right term for everyday actions.
Will be nice when “patient” itself embodies all that we want e-patient to mean.