Amy Tenderich weighs in on the name debate: patient vs. consumer. Almost anything is better than cyberchondriac or medical googler, but e-patient is still my favorite.
I help people navigate health and technology.
Footer
Recent Comments
on Caregiver Survival Guide: “Thank you, Nina! When my loved one and I were forging our care relationship one of my stipulations was that…” Oct 26, 16:28
on Caregiver Survival Guide: “To my fellow caregivers: Give yourself permission to ask for help. Give yourself permission to receive help. Be relentless about…” Oct 26, 15:36
on Wow! How? Psychedelic Outlaws: “This is such a thoughtful article — I especially appreciated the way you connected the science with real-world experiences. In…” Oct 26, 01:32
I loathe the word “consumer” — as if we use up healthcare. “Patient” isn’t much better, though it goes nicely with “waiting room”. I personally lobbied for “Fergusons”, but Tom put his foot down on that one.
How about “Health Activist”? That was a suggestion from Marie Connelly over on DiabetesMine.com. I also like Jane Sarasohn-Kahn’s suggestion of “citizen.”
Seems like each term
Seems like each term has pro’s and con’s. The reality is that we ARE acting like health consumers, but the term sure is cold and doesn’t embrace the elements of being a good, or savvy consumer. e-patient much better at that I think. Health Activist makes me think of people marching on Washington–which although probably not a bad idea–not the right term for everyday actions.
Will be nice when “patient” itself embodies all that we want e-patient to mean.